Middle East conflict
Note
Ongoing Israel–Iran–US confrontation and its regional extensions through non-state actors — Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis — reach India through multiple channels: crude and LNG prices, Strait of Hormuz and Red Sea shipping risk, remittances from the Gulf, and evacuation operations for Indian nationals. India holds a simultaneous defence relationship with Israel and an energy relationship with Iran, placing it in a strategic balancing position where both parties are partners.
In the news
Questions on this topic
Consider the following statements regarding the Houthi movement, the Yemen civil war, and their broader geopolitical context:
- The Houthis, also known as Ansar Allah, represent a Zaidi Shia revivalist movement that seized control of Yemen's capital, Sanaa, in 2014, triggering intensified foreign involvement in the civil war.
- The Bab al-Mandeb Strait, over which the Houthis have sought leverage, connects the Red Sea to the Indian Ocean and is strategically significant for global shipping.
- The Houthis are part of Iran's 'Axis of Resistance' in West Asia, a grouping that also includes Hamas and Hezbollah — all of which are Shia organisations backed by Iran on a sectarian basis.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
Statement 1 is correct: the Houthis (Ansar Allah) are a Zaidi Shia revivalist movement that seized Sanaa in 2014, drawing in external powers — Iran backing the Houthis and the US and Saudi Arabia backing the internationally recognised government. Statement 2 is correct: the Bab al-Mandeb Strait connects the Red Sea to the Indian Ocean, making it a critical chokepoint for global maritime trade; Houthi control or leverage over it directly threatens international shipping lanes. Statement 3 is incorrect: although all three groups are part of Iran's 'Axis of Resistance' and receive Iranian support, characterising them uniformly as Shia organisations backed purely on a sectarian basis is a conceptual error. Hamas is a Sunni Islamist organisation (a Palestinian offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood), not Shia. Iran backs Hamas on the basis of shared opposition to Israel and anti-Western ideology, not Shia solidarity. Describing the Axis of Resistance as a uniformly Shia bloc misrepresents the ideological diversity within Iran's proxy network.
Consider the following pairs regarding India's stated positions and actions in the context of the Israel–Palestine conflict and international accountability mechanisms:
- India's vote on UN ceasefire resolutions relating to Israel–Palestine — Abstention, neither supporting nor opposing
- UN General Assembly (UNGA) — Has binding enforcement power to implement resolutions against member-states
- International Criminal Court (ICC) — Can issue arrest warrants against officials implicated in war crimes
Which of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?
Explanation
Pair 1 is correctly matched: India has consistently abstained on UN resolutions calling for a ceasefire or action against Israel — a deliberate balancing act between upholding Palestinian rights and preserving its strategic partnership with Israel. Pair 2 is incorrectly matched: the UN General Assembly does NOT possess binding enforcement powers; it can pass resolutions but cannot compel member-states to implement them. This is a foundational distinction in the UN architecture — enforcement authority in matters of international peace and security rests with the UN Security Council under Chapter VII of the UN Charter. Pair 3 is correctly matched: the International Criminal Court can and does issue arrest warrants against individuals — including state officials — credibly suspected of war crimes, crimes against humanity, or genocide, as was noted in calls for cooperation with the ICC over Israeli officials and soldiers.
Your record on this topic
Sign in to see how many of these you have answered, which ones you got wrong, and to practise this topic on its own.
Sign in →