Reforestation
Note
Policy and ecological dimensions of restoring degraded forest lands operate under the National Forest Policy 1988, the Compensatory Afforestation Fund Act 2016 (CAMPA), and the Green India Mission under NAPCC. India's NDC commits to creating an additional carbon sink of 2.5–3 billion tonnes of CO₂ equivalent through forest cover by 2030. Reforestation links carbon sequestration, biodiversity recovery, watershed stabilisation, and livelihood generation for forest-dependent communities, spanning environment, climate policy, and tribal rights across multiple governance layers.
In the news
Questions on this topic
Consider the following statements regarding international forest conservation frameworks and related commitments:
- The Glasgow Forest Declaration aims to halt and reverse deforestation and forest degradation by 2030, and its progress is tracked independently of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework's 30x30 target.
- The 30x30 target — conserving 30 per cent of the world's land and sea areas by 2030 — forms part of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, adopted in 2022.
- Under the Paris Agreement framework, Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) are legally binding documents that compel countries to implement specific forest restoration measures, including free, prior and informed consent obligations towards Indigenous Peoples.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
Statement 1 is correct: The Glasgow Forest Declaration (agreed at COP26 in 2021) is a standalone political commitment among over 140 countries to halt and reverse deforestation by 2030; it is tracked by independent assessments such as the Forest Declaration Assessment. The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework's 30x30 target is a parallel but distinct commitment — adopted under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), not the UNFCCC. Both operate within the 2030 timeline but originate from separate treaty processes. Statement 2 is correct: The 30x30 target (protecting 30% of land and sea areas by 2030) is indeed a core pillar of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, adopted at COP15 in 2022 under the CBD. Statement 3 is false for two overlapping reasons: First, NDCs are not legally binding in terms of their content — the Paris Agreement mandates submission and progressive ambition, but the domestic actions described in NDCs carry no international legal enforcement. Second, the Paris Agreement imposes no specific obligation on countries to include free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) provisions for Indigenous Peoples in their NDCs; such references, where they exist, remain largely descriptive and voluntary. The conflation of NDCs as binding instruments and FPIC as a treaty-mandated requirement is a common misconception that Statement 3 exploits.
Your record on this topic
Sign in to see how many of these you have answered, which ones you got wrong, and to practise this topic on its own.
Sign in →Under the same heading
- Air Quality Index
- Air pollution
- Circular economy
- Compensatory afforestation under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and the CAMPA framework
- Eco-sensitive zones, Aravalli mining
- Ecological Interactions, Phenology and Indicator Species
- Endangered wildlife
- Gadgil and Kasturirangan reports
- Illegal riverbed mining
- Invasive species
- Just transition
- Land degradation and ecological restoration
- National Coastal Mission (NCM 2.0)
- Noise pollution
- Offshore mining
- Regenerative agriculture
- Waste management
- Waste-to-energy
- Wetland Conservation: Ramsar Convention and Wetlands Rules, 2017