UPSC Current Affairs Quiz, 3 November 2026

Published

The news and its questions

Five free, with explanations

El Niño · GS-I

GeographyThe Hindu3 November

Shahi Masjid imam calls for ‘used water harvesting pit’ to recharge groundwater against El Nino backdrop ↗

Consider the following statements regarding El Niño and its relationship with Indian monsoon rainfall:Answer ▾
  1. El Niño refers to the anomalous warming of surface waters in the central and eastern tropical Pacific Ocean, which is part of the broader El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phenomenon.
  2. El Niño years are consistently associated with above-normal rainfall over the Indian subcontinent due to enhanced moisture flux from the Pacific Ocean.
  3. The Southern Oscillation Index (SOI), which measures the pressure difference between Tahiti and Darwin, is used as an indicator of ENSO conditions affecting Asian monsoon systems.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Correct

Incorrect. The answer is A

Explanation

El Niño is defined by the anomalous warming of sea-surface temperatures in the central and eastern equatorial Pacific, and it forms the warm phase of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) system — Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect: El Niño is teleconnected to below-normal (deficit) rainfall over India, not above-normal; the suppression of the Walker Circulation during El Niño weakens the Indian summer monsoon, historically leading to drought conditions in the subcontinent — which is precisely why Indian state governments issue warnings about El Niño-driven rainfall deficits. Statement 3 is correct: the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI), computed as the standardised pressure anomaly difference between Tahiti and Darwin (Australia), is the canonical atmospheric indicator of ENSO state and is used by meteorologists to track and forecast monsoon conditions across South and Southeast Asia.

Election Commission of India · GS-II

Polity & GovernanceThe Hindu3 November

Delhi SIR: Aadhaar alone not enough, BLOs asked to seek ‘citizenship proof’ from voters ↗

Consider the following statements regarding the framework for special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and the role of Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) under the Representation of the People Act, 1950 and Registration of Electors Rules, 1960:Answer ▾
  1. The fundamental eligibility requirement for registration as an elector is Indian citizenship, being at least 18 years of age, and ordinary residence in the constituency — and the absence of a particular prescribed document does not by itself render a person ineligible.
  2. An ERO who is not satisfied with the evidence produced during revision may delete an elector from the roll without recording any reasons, provided the BLO's field verification report is negative.
  3. The Aadhaar card, being a proof of identity issued by a statutory authority, is treated as sufficient proof of citizenship for the purpose of establishing eligibility as an elector under the electoral roll revision framework.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Correct

Incorrect. The answer is A

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct. The statutory eligibility criteria for registration as an elector are Indian citizenship, attaining the age of 18, and ordinary residence in the constituency. The inability to produce a specific document from the prescribed list does not automatically negate eligibility — the ERO retains discretion to mark an elector eligible if field verification by the BLO is satisfactory. Statement 2 is incorrect. Under the electoral roll revision framework, an ERO who finds an elector ineligible must pass a 'speaking order' clearly recording reasons for deletion; arbitrary or unreasoned deletions are specifically prohibited. The requirement for a speaking order is a procedural safeguard against arbitrary removal from the rolls. Statement 3 is incorrect. Aadhaar is a proof of identity and address issued under the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016, but it is not a proof of citizenship. The Election Commission has separately clarified that Aadhaar alone is insufficient to establish citizenship for the purposes of electoral roll revision, and EROs are directed to seek documents from the prescribed list of 11 documents — including birth certificates, passports, and educational certificates — to establish eligibility.

Parliamentary committees and legislative scrutiny · GS-II

Polity & GovernanceThe Hindu3 November

Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla calls for use of technology in auditing, CM Satheesan flags wrong auditing methodologies ↗

Consider the following pairs regarding parliamentary financial committees in India and their key characteristics:Answer ▾
  1. Public Accounts Committee — Chairperson is, by convention, a member of the Opposition party
  2. Estimates Committee — Examines CAG reports and appropriation accounts to scrutinise public expenditure
  3. Committee on Public Undertakings — Examines the accounts of public sector undertakings and CAG reports on them

Which of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?

Correct

Incorrect. The answer is A

Explanation

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has a well-established democratic convention that its Chairperson is drawn from the principal Opposition party in the Lok Sabha. This practice underscores parliamentary accountability — the Opposition scrutinises government expenditure. Pair 1 is therefore correctly matched. The Estimates Committee does NOT examine CAG reports or appropriation accounts. Its mandate is to examine the estimates of expenditure included in the budget and suggest economies or improvements in policy execution before money is spent — a forward-looking function. Examination of CAG reports and appropriation accounts is the specific mandate of the Public Accounts Committee, not the Estimates Committee. Pair 2 is therefore incorrectly matched. The Committee on Public Undertakings (COPU) does examine the accounts of government companies and corporations, and also takes up CAG reports on public undertakings for scrutiny. Pair 3 is correctly matched. Hence, pairs 1 and 3 are correctly matched.

Counterfeit drug rackets · GS-II

SocietyThe Hindu3 November

ED attaches assets, freezes bank account in counterfeit medicines racket; searches five premises in Bengaluru ↗

Consider the following pairs regarding offences and definitions under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940:Answer ▾
  1. Spurious drug — a drug that is an imitation of, or a substitute for, another drug, or which purports to be a drug but does not contain the drug, or bears the name of another drug
  2. Adulterated drug — a drug in which any substance has been mixed or packed so as to reduce its quality or strength
  3. Misbranded drug — a drug which is not labelled in the prescribed manner or whose label or container or anything accompanying the drug bears any statement, design or device which makes any false claim for the drug

Which of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?

Correct

Incorrect. The answer is D

Explanation

Under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, the three categories are distinctly defined. A 'spurious drug' (Section 17B) includes a drug that is an imitation of or substitute for another drug, or one that purports to be a drug but does not contain it, or that falsely bears the name of another drug — directly relevant to the practice of repackaging generic formulations and labelling them as branded products. An 'adulterated drug' (Section 17A) refers to a drug in which any substance has been mixed or packed so as to reduce its quality or strength, or where any substance has been substituted wholly or in part. A 'misbranded drug' (Section 17) refers to a drug which is not labelled in the prescribed manner or whose label makes any false claim. All three definitions are correctly matched with their respective descriptions as laid down in the Act. The distinctions among these three categories matter because they attract different penal provisions under the Act and implicate different regulatory obligations of the Drug Controlling Authorities.

Digital Personal Data Protection Act · GS-III

Polity & GovernanceThe Hindu3 November

How AI training models could compromise privacy ↗

Consider the following pairs matching legal frameworks with their key features regarding personal data regulation in India:Answer ▾
  1. IT Act, 2000 and SPDI Rules, 2011 — Regulated cross-border transfer of 'sensitive personal data' subject to adequacy of protection at the recipient end and either contractual necessity or consent
  2. Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 — Succeeded the IT Act regime and introduced a phased implementation with certain consent and safety provisions becoming effective from 2027
  3. IT Act, 2000 regime — Applied its data-protection rules equally to all personal data, including names, addresses, phone numbers, browsing history, and behavioural patterns

Which of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?

Correct

Incorrect. The answer is B

Explanation

Pair 1 is correctly matched: under the IT Act, 2000 read with the Sensitive Personal Data or Information (SPDI) Rules, 2011, transfer of sensitive personal data outside India was permissible provided the recipient ensured a protection standard equivalent to Indian law, and the transfer was either necessary for a lawful contract or had been consented to by the data subject. An assertion or claim of adequacy was sufficient — there was no independent verification mechanism. Pair 2 is also correctly matched: the DPDP Act, 2023 replaced the earlier IT Act regime as the primary framework for personal data protection, with its Rules notified in November 2025 and a phased rollout under which certain consent and safety provisions take effect only in 2027. Pair 3 is incorrectly matched and is the key conceptual distractor: the SPDI Rules under the IT Act regime applied only to a defined list of 'sensitive personal data' (financial records, medical or health details, sexual orientation, biometric information, etc.). Categories such as names, addresses, phone numbers, caste, religion, political affiliations, browsing history, social media activity, and online or offline behavioural patterns were explicitly excluded from the Rules' protections — a major gap that the DPDP Act framework seeks to address.

After five

Sign in for the rest of the day’s questions.

An account scores your answers, keeps your mistakes so you can practise them again, fills in the progress tree below, and lets you practise by topic.

Sign in

Days with questions

Earlier days →